Edward Dutton is born in 1980. He is just a child really. But the reality is he is one of the few people building on the brilliant scholarship of Gregory Clark. We must listen to him with our anti-elitist instincts intact but still with an open mind.

It cannot be emphasised enough: A key component to the improving health of the gene pool is that rich slobs are downwardly mobile. There is no humane elitist policy-settings that can work, if the goal is the slow improvement of the species. End of story, full stop, missing you, hu hu hu, the end.

Without an egalitarian context of rich offspring falling down in their socio-economic standing, there can be no general improvement of the human race, and as a practical matter we want to, within reason, preserve all races. Not to be extreme about it. But we need the diversity, even as we bring out the talent of all the nations.

Because of the need for rich offspring to be downwardly mobile there is no room for the current state supported usury, or indeed for the current big corporate communism. We must instead go for the sole trader paradise, and meeting Henry George halfway.

And just incidentally the road to the workers paradise is through the sole trader paradise ……. and meeting Henry George Halfway.

More Later

I am going to make a bit of a leap here by way of analogy. Finding out what Michael Behe says constitutes “irreducible complexity” and comparing that to my own thinking about the evolution of bipedalism.  Bipedalism, with hands or hand-like claws may not be a case of irreducible complexity.  But its something close to that unless your ancestors spent time living in the trees.  On the open ground, from a starting point of being four-legged, there is no real scope to evolve hands or hand-like claws.  Except in tiny critters where the blades of grass become akin to branches.  And with tiny critters the gravity is such that having sophisticated little claws isn’t really a hindrance to running on all fours.

Irreducible Complexity

Proof that doctrinaire Darwinists have been deceiving us about the state of their own theory. 

As soon as your ancestors scurry up into the trees then everything changes.  This achieves two things.  Firstly the advantages of being better able to grasp branches becomes a 24 hour thing without any downside. Secondly if the trees are spaced out you get the partial but not total separation needed for the same selective pressures to apply to the separated populations.  So when they do interbreed, the offspring are conditioned by these selective pressures.

So the ancestors of the dinosaurs were tree-dwellers, and our ancestors also, at least for a time.  People object to this conclusion on the weirdest of grounds.  They say … ho ho the bear has hand-like claws.  Do they really suppose for one minute that the bear didn’t have tree-dwelling ancestors for a time?  They say “Ho Ho the Meer cat can stand up straight”  But the Meer-Cats ancestors were surely tree-dwellers, they are not bipedal and yet they scurry up trees every other hour to this day.

Limits To Fossil Evidence

Contrary to popular opinion direct ancestry cannot be ascertained by way of the fossil record alone.  It would require cross-referencing with genetic information, and the oldest genome we have is from a horse in the Yukon no more than one million years old.

((((See how I accept the criticisms of the intelligent design crowd without being too extremist about it? This characteristic is the scientific attitude in my view.  You need three lines of evidence minimum to be sure of something.  The fossils on their own tell us almost nothing.  But if we could have genetic information to cross-reference with the fossils, three types of dating proxies in every case, and we didn’t throw out the fossils that didn’t conform with the mainstream narrative, then and only then would we have ourselves a serious science.  We don’t have these things.  So we really cannot be too presumptuous.  Its okay to meet the intelligent design crowd halfway on matters of this sort.))))

Setting the precedent of “changing the venue.”

So we can say that the evolution of hands and hand-like claws is something akin to irreducible-complexity-lite on the ground.  But nothing of the sort, if we change the venue. 

I think this sets a precedent.  I think it means that the first thing we do when confronted by ridiculous obstacles to ‘godless evolution’ (shorthand for pure naturalism), the first thing to do is change the venue, when formulating an hypothesis to explain it.  Lets put changing the venue aside for one moment while we get a couple of caveats out of the way.

(((((Pure materialism is out of the question now that we have emerged from anti-aether brain-washing.  Yet purely blind naturalism is still a respectable point of view and its my preferred hypothesis.  The scientific method demands that I must be respectful of parallel hypotheses.  I only mention it as a personal prejudice. I think the intelligent design crowd are winning for the moment. 

What is not okay is the sort of dimwitted doctrinaire approach of someone like PZ Myers. A fellow so unsound he still sees nothing suspicious about modern vaccines, the big bang, or Keynesian spending sprees. A real twat, and I don’t mean that in a good way.   More faith-based and unscientific than any biblical literalist, and far more unpleasant.))))

Its unscientific to rule out intelligent design.

Even though there are some intelligent people around that still take the biblical literalist approach to things I have no patience for it.  I think thats entirely outside of science, since its derived by failing to have multiple hypotheses in parallel and ranking and re-ranking them.  Like modern doctrinaire Darwinists of the low IQ variety its simple faith-based thinking, with a big bias of working backwards from a preferred conclusion. They are equally as bad as each-other from that point of view, though in the new century the bible literalists are more pleasant and less censorious than PZ Myers is ever going to be. But I cannot take it seriously as science.   But less presumptuous versions of intelligent design must be taken seriously. And I can tell you why.

Aether theory allows that consciousness could precede matter. 

Any serious understanding of the evolution of the universe implies that aether preceded matter.  Since we can see distant stars, this means that there is aether chock-full in the areas in-between and relativity little matter.  Since every nucleon that is visible and in the same gravitational network,  manifestly connects every other, directly or indirectly, this implies the primacy of aether as the original substance as compared to substance itself.  Here we dismiss idiocy in physics and cosmology and we can do that on logical grounds with far more certainty even than dismissing biblical literalism.  Even the tendentious biblical literalists rationalise their beliefs rather than rejecting logic outright.  So we don’t need to tarry on bad physics for one second.

Since we are very sure that aether precedes matter, and that matter is a kind of sub-aethereal phenomenon, it can never be ruled out that consciousness did not evolve prior to matter.  Here I am not talking about a universe wide consciousness. But for example the idea of a solar spirit, or a planetary spirit, this simply cannot be ruled out.  I might wish it to be otherwise.  You might wish it to be otherwise, but this is science.  And we cannot arbitrarily rule things out in science.

Actually I think animism on a technical level is even harder to rule out than a planetary consciousness.  Who is to say that an aethereal consciousness could not associate itself with a small grouping of trees attached to a deep mycelial network? The idea could hardly be more primitive, but since aether preceded matter and has been around for trillions to the power of trillions of years, it cannot be ruled out even a little bit.

One annoyance one has with the very idea of intelligent design is akin with the annoying idea of ancient aliens.  Its annoying because no matter how well it fits the data, its a blockage to furtherance of the enquiry.  If we see large rocks being used in construction and we say “look the aliens probably did it” well thats fits the data fine but it means that the enquiry grinds to a halt, if we are complacent about that one hypothesis.  Likewise with intelligent design.  So we take the same approach.  We cannot rule it out, but on the other hand we must not let intelligent design be the end of the hypothesis formation process.

Irreducible Complexity.

In the early canonical lectures of Michael Behe he puts forward three examples of irreducible complexity.  The first being more of an ambit claim.  He explains how complicated eyesight is. Then he goes to a very simple human-invented example of irreducible complexity …… that is to say the old-fashioned mouse-trap.  He shows why a mouse-trap in principle has to be conceived as an whole, how each part is useless as to purpose on its own until they all come together.  And so traditional Darwinism is unable to bridge that gap.  Other kinds of evolution maybe. But certainly not traditional Darwinism.

Than he goes to the best example which is this massively intricate flagellum.  This combines the complexity of the eye with the seemingly impossibility of finding an evolutionary path for it.

Now I think that eyesight is hugely complex.   But perhaps not irreducibly so once we have gotten past what may be thought of as the chemical and informational hurdles to evolution. But the flagellum still seems to be irreducibly complex at any stage.

More Later.

If the Haka was all about peace, love and kisses, would you remember your friends when the time came?  People talk.  The whispers are out there. The people gossip and they say that you will forget your friends.

DO THE HAKA

IF ITS ALL ABOUT ANGER, WILL YOU REMEMBER YOUR FRIENDS? OR ARE YOU BURNT OUT?

Do the Haka.  Do the haka until your throat is coarse and your thighs are bleeding.  But don’t forget your anger when the cameras are gone.  You must avenge your murdered school friends.  School friends are the best friends are the friends you remember.  Will you deny them three times before the “cock crows” the night you find out that it was the Jews who killed them?

That night that you find out that it was the Jews who killed your school friends, will you yawn and let them lie there in the ground unavenged?   Will you realise that your anger and your humanity have gone? Or will you act to end the terrorist state of Israel?

Do The Haka

We almost forgot you Van McCoy.  But at the going down of the sun, and in the morning, we are going to remember our school friends…. murdered by the Jews. 

Do the Haka, but don’t burn all that anger out.  Because when you grow up, you must have enough anger left over to end that miserable little country just as quickly and as peacefully as can possibly be achieved. Its with your brains and your education that you must end this disgusting zionist entity.  You don’t need the weapons that they murdered your friends with.  Well you need them but they can stay safely locked up at home.

Let the children DO THE HAKA.  “Let the children boogie” and all that.  But will they remember their friends when they find out it was Judea that killed their friends? The older generation didn’t remember their countrymen, once they found out that the Jews did 9/11.   Not everything about your elders is right, good and proper.   Respect your Elders but remember your friends.

DO THE HAKA

VAN MCCOY.  WE BARELY KNEW YOU.  BUT WE WILL NEVER FORGET OUR MURDERED SCHOOL FRIENDS. THIS AINT OVER. NOT BY A LONG SHOT.

So if that Haka WASN’T a war battle cry would you see the job through? Would you get the job done?

But there has been something that has been bugging me about your Haka children.  It was supposed to be about war.  I’m not criticising your skills.  I think you did an awesome Haka and all that.   But there was something wrong about it.

You see I looked behind your eyes. And I think I saw that your Haka WAS really about peace, love and kisses.   You had me fooled for awhile but you fool me no longer. And if your Haka WASN’T about war and violence then maybe you kids will have the cooler kind of anger,  that will see the job done.

You were really grieving.

It was all about peace, love, and kisses. 

The Jews attacked Australia and Indonesia in Bali. They attacked the whole world in New York and these were both nuclear attacks.  Eternal crazies of this sort must be brought under strict third party supervision.  And the cousins of your friends need to go home to Palestine and get their houses back.

Give us the tools.  And we will finish the job. 

What are the tools to finish the job and avenge your school friends murdered by the Jews?

What tools do you need to finish the job? Education.  You need to study hard.  Get good grades.  Learn to write well.  Bring this Jewish terrorist state down with words.  And you need to remember your friends every year.  And every year you say this aint over. This aint over.  This aint over.  Not by a long shot. 

So right now do you what you need to do.  Light all the candles until you run out of fire.  But get yourself educated. And lets finish this fight once and for all time.

Getting Discouraged

When you kids look into this situation there will come a time when you want to give up.  You will think that the oligarchy and elite Jew pigs are the authors of history and that there is nothing that can be done.  But it is love that is the real author of history.   You have to be in this for the long haul.  And you should make it a fun thing almost every step of the way.

The saviour commands that we love our enemy. 

The Jews are our enemy and we must have enough love left over for them also. 

Since this is a struggle and a quest that will take many decades and centuries you must learn to work hard but still have fun, and be of a joyous heart every step of the way.

Unfortunately what I said above now goes in spades for our friend Jason Wilson. Jason Wilson is one of the main professional opinion formers at the heart of the motive for this latest Jew/Gladio 2.0 killing spree. He could not get out of this central role if he tried.

The Guardian is a guardian of centre-left opinion. Its there to nurse people along on these Jew agendas. It criticises Israel a great deal but you don’t expect rags like this to take a crude approach and be successful. Basically it herds mildly anti-War and tepidly centre-left types along very carefully to be pretty fine and okay with the mass-murder of Muslims,  in distant countries.  A Guardian reader has been conditioned to be only mildly uncomfortable with the way the West has slaughtered millions of Muslims since 9/11.   Full-blown agents like George Monbiot and Sunny Hundal are pretty easy to spot.

Jason isn’t one of these. But because the target of this particular Muslim slaughter is the alt-right, and the alt-right is Jason Wilsons journalistic beat, the terrorist community is kind of relying on him, almost more than anyone right now. He’s got to convince anyone that this didn’t happen specifically, via Mossad. But it happened organically. Organically not specifically.

Its Jason Wilson’s role, and the role of the Jew-controlled news, to detract from the specifics of the slaughter. In this fantasy,  Muslim people were slaughtered organically through the careless talk and associations of various rightests in Australia. Various free-thinking right-wingers who (sadly have been taken in by the Jew-dominated false flag attacks and so) logically want to reduce Muslim immigration.

Jason has a very clear role now. Its to argue in such a way as to clamp down on free speech of the alt right on social media. And to put us all under surveillance. He won’t be saying that we ought to be all put under surveillance. He won’t be THINKING that we all ought to be put under surveillance. Rather he will be saying that there was not enough attention paid to us. Why were we not on the radar? All that sort of thing.  The Alt-right is not on the radar because they are not violent.  But the heat will come down on us and not on the terrorist community, when in sober reality every synagogue and Jewish cemetery in the world ought to be bugged.

People are traumatised by these attacks. Not me. I always expect them to be fakes now. So I was saved the huge trauma of it all because I only belatedly realised that it was a real mass-murder this time. Jason will no less be shaken up by this mass-killing than anyone else. So at the moment on his twitter account he’s lashing out against mild conservatives who want to be measured and cautious with Muslim immigration.

#Millers Crossing: It turned out the old man was still an artist with the left-jab.

The front-man for this Jew terrorist attack is of course an Anglo. Aussie-Whitey, working for the Jews, had to do the whole thing on streaming video, to prove his ethnic identity. This had to be done or we would not have the narrative.

When you have a difficult life-ending and life-altering job to do,  the last thing you want to be concerned with is messing around with cameras. But lately the Jews have been carrying out fake events where crisis actors only pretended to be victims. Well that gets a bit old after awhile,  and they needed a bit more realism for a change. Hence the slaughter had to be authentic and clearly recorded, so as to be proven to be real, and a full-blown anglo had to do the job.

So team Jew sent out Rudyard Kiplings Saxon live on video, and oddly enough someone was recording the live streaming. We should be looking for a chain of custody. Putting back the J in Who: Which Jew first recorded the live stream? Did he alert the police? He should have alerted the police and he should be on record. But perhaps he recorded it and DIDN’T alert the police. In any case its considerations of this type, we ought to be sorting out. The chain of custody of the film has to be known to find the perps.

A year ago I pointed out to Jason personally, that Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing were faked events, and that 9/11 was largely a Jew operation on the day … at least in New York. It wouldn’t matter if he did the research, and secretly wound up agreeing with me. He’s not in the position to let the reality of major terrorist events influence him in any way.

So now Jason is giving one of our Senators a hard time for one or two stray sentences. He is halfway siding with the kid who broke an egg over the Senators head. Not quite but almost. On his twitter he’s got all sorts of loose talk condemning the Senators statements. In sober reality everything the Senator has said has a certain understandable logic to it.  Almost everything the Senator has said has been pretty mild.   But with the shock of the slaughter ….  these tiny heresies now appear deeply incendiary. And that is the point of the Jewish human sacrifice this time around.

Just go over what the Senator has said before and after the Jew slaughter. The statements are not the least bit incendiary in reality.  They are coloured a bit by the Senators misapprehension of who is the real terrorist community.  Thats unfortunate, but despite this wrongheadedness, there is a great deal of truth in his statements.

This is what the Jew slaughter was supposed to do. The slaughter was supposed to make mildly heretical statements seem scary. 

Amongst Jason and his followers, many of whom I’ve had friendly conversations with (going back as early as 2005) this goal has been fantastically successful.

Here is Jasons twitter

But go easy on him because in the wake of the Jew false flag attack he’s a little bit unhinged. He’s claiming things that he would not claim in a sane frame of mind. He went so far as to retweet some leftist loony-toon to the effect  that we alt-right conservatives wanted to see these Muslims killed and an enemy population disciplined. This sort of utter crazy-talk.

Jason is someone who doesn’t understand false flag terrorism, so he’s trying to make sense of things. When we are surprised and traumatised we think out loud trying to make sense of the senseless.

Jason if you are out there I think you should edit your tweets a bit. Take out the incendiary nonsense.  And on a non-professional basis have a good think about the hard work that goes into a multi-media global terrorist event of this sort.   Its not about some kid feeling a bit daffy after listening to Andrew Bolt.  Terrorist attacks are not spur of the moment lashing out.  Spur of the moment lashing out is what you and Liam are up to right now.

Time to try and get level-headed and sophisticated about major terrorist attacks.  Tame Iti says;  “Everyone needs to work on their attitude.”  But the problem is not one of gentile-attitude.  The problem is a specific terrorist attack carried out by a non-gentile intelligence agency.

Lets play a game. Lets call it ASK AHED.

GMB Sez … Ahed? Who Massacres Muslims in Christs Church ?

Ahed sez;  GMB Is That A Trick Question? Jews Massacre Muslims In Christs Church!

Surely we know this already.  This fellow has been missing for seven years.  He’s not been working a high wage job, in a rich country, planning to launch a terrorist attack far from home.  Try and get back to the real world of paying the bills.  Clearly he’s fallen into the hands of the terrorist community. The terrorist community is the Jewish community and always has been.

The Jews did 9/11.  The Jews were huge in the Sandy Hook pantomime. The Jews shoot Muslim children from the other side of a fence where they are not threatened.  The Jews were the ones who practiced mass murder under Jewish communism.  The Jews were always the ones caught practicing human sacrifice going centuries back.

If he had gone from Grafton straight to Christchurch on annual leave, maybe you could believe that this is not a Jew operation. But even in that case where would he have gotten all the illegal weapons from? New Zealanders carry lots of weapons on their farms but there is not much of an illegal gun trade in that country. So its another Israeli setup supported by the international oligarchy.  And obviously so.

If you were feeling daffy one day and wanted to blow all your Australian earned money killing Muslims in another country how would you go about fantasising about gathering all the arsenal together IN THAT COUNTRY.   But he didn’t have savings and annual leave from a great plumbing job in Australia.  He’s been gone for 7 years.  Travelling with such frequency you would think Mossad were renting his passport.  So obviously he’s fallen into the hands of the Jews since where else would he get the weapons from?

All this handwringing about Jordan Peterson letting himself get photoed with a fellow wearing the wrong shirt. This is detracting us from finding out which Jews organised this massacre. There was a massacre of Muslims. Who orders up massacres of Muslims? Its Jews that do this, and its a waste of time worrying about what Jordan Peterson ought to do at the spur of the moment.

Four people have been arrested with regards to this. Thats called a conspiracy to massacre Muslims. There was a conspiracy to massacre Muslims. Are you following me? Am I going too fast for you? WHO carries out conspiracies to massacre Muslims? JEWS carry out conspiracies to massacre Muslims.

Jews Never Apologise For Anything No Matter How Grievous

Why Do We Find The Idea Of A Jew Apology So Confronting?  Its Because They Are Demonic. 

This fellow has had NO KNOWN JOB FOR SEVEN FUCKING YEARS. Now get it together people. He hasn’t been in Australia copping dog whistles from Jordan Peterson or any other mildly conservative individuals. Slap yourself out of it and pay attention to what is going on around you. He hasn’t had the sort of job for seven years that could allow him to plan and carry out a military attack in a foreign country. This takes time and money and more wages then he’s been caught working for. This was a huge Mossad operation.

Ongoing.

I am forced to push science forward by kicking people in the head.  I am more sympathetic to the top intelligent design people.  Maybe about five of them would pass my quality control.  But secretly I am still pro-evolution.  So its time.

Time to take a few Evolution advocates and lead them by the nose. I call this process. Taking it to the streets. They don’t know me but I’m their brother.

GMB Sez:

Are we still insisting that the abiogenesis must have happened on the surface of the early earth? Or have we woken up to the reality that we need a venue change yet?

James Downard sez

I don’t recall if I mentioned it in this video specifically, but I have in others noted that the trend in the research is to focus on ocean vents etc, not necessarily very deep, but outside any surface worry about unfiltered UV radiation, but close enough to draw on the organics brought to earth in comets and asteroids.

GMB sez

It has to be a “reducing environment” so we might want to go deeper and not be restricted by either a one planet operation or some young universe creation myth like the big bang. You guys are going to get slapped around if you keep toeing the line on crap oligarchy directed cosmology and physics.

The assumption is all these reducing gasses. And you have a disconnect between all these reducing gasses and what people think they know about the early surface of the earth. But if you might find out that deep on a moon, and without much of an atmosphere, you can have an electrically reduced environment, then you don’t need to be so dependent on a “just so” grouping of gasses.

James Downard sez

@GMBCATASTROPHE The origin of the universe in the Big Bang is separate from the origin of life on earth, and it is not a myth but the only model that accounts for the data. “You guys”? by which you mean the actual scientists? Perhaps you should offer some sources on what you think accounts for the first life. And also when you think that was.

James Downard sez

@GMBCATASTROPHE Sources please on what you think you’re talking about, G
Reply

GMB sez:

No the Big Bang in no way accounts for the data. You guys in chemistry, organic chemistry and micro-biology, you are proper scientists and yet you allow yourselves to get pushed around by top-down bullshitartistry. The Big bang is such bad science it has to be assumed to be a psychological operation. It takes one proxy and misuses it. It takes a single proxy and uses it to replace three unknown data-sets. Thats science fraud.

In all the rest of science you need at least three proxies to find one unknown dataset. Even if one of these is just a tie-breaker. You are always going to be lacking in credibility if you insist on bad cosmology, leaving you with a one-planet young universe view of evolution.

James Downard sez

@GMBCATASTROPHE Sorry, your assertion counts diddly, G. Please offer sources on this.
Reply

GMB sez:

Come on man. You know I don’t need sources since you know what I’m saying is true. The Big Bang is an appeal to pure magic. Really obvious Voodoo. The most irrational creation myth, not excluding those involving tortoises.

Now another couple of items that will help you get your thinking together here. The conservation of matter is not merely wrong its a logical contradiction. If matter were conserved there would be no matter ever. There is no getting around the logic of that.

Likewise the conservation of energy is not merely wrong. It cannot be true since otherwise there would be no energy. This reality cannot be overcome.

Plus there is no such thing as a wave where nothing is waving hence aether theory is appropriate for physics.

Once we get that far this evolution business isn’t so difficult after all.

GMB sez:

No no. Attempt to be a scientist. Take every assertion I’ve made here. I’m right, if you disagree with me on even any of these basic logical ideas you are wrong. The people who run physics and cosmology have decided that they are above and beyond logic. Once you deep-six their logical contradictions and ponder the matter for awhile you wind up with a cosmology where evolution is much more credible. And you don’t need to be in denial of what is necessary to get the development of proteins and so forth.

Graeme Birds theory of the whale says that the whale is a gigantic floating foetus.  I want to state that up front for google reasons so that it may be recognised as my original conception.   But usually I find that others have thought about these things well before myself.

The main reasons that intelligent design will continue to be on the upswing are 1.  The idiocy, dogmatism, and tunnel vision of the neo-Darwinists. 2. The sophistication and good humour of maybe half a dozen intelligent design advocates.   If you favour straight evolution it is to these guys you want to go to, to get good ideas, to help flesh out your concept of evolution …..

From Elsewhere:

“We may be able to make up part of the huge gap in our explanation of evolution by getting our cosmology right. This idea that we’ve only been around for shy of 14 billion years. And the concept that evolution is a one planet phenomenon is pretty stupid.

Moons grow to planets grow to stars grow to bigger stars. At any point of this process the large oblate spheroid can blow up, much of the material will be recycled, and a great deal of cellular complexity can be maintained in this process. Forget anything that Einstein said; he was completely full of shit. So what I am saying is once we get the cosmology right ….. well we cannot really answer Professor Behe’s objections. But still we can make up some of the gap perhaps. The mainstream is just so fraudulent. But they ought to make a choice.

Aether Changes Everything And Opens Up Both Theological, And Atheistic Possibilities.

If they want to hold onto some sort of Darwinist outlook they have to get rid of this abuse-based idea that they will make the aether an outlaw. No aether they reckon. Even though the next minute they will give you the wave-length of the colour purple. No aether they say but light has a measurable wave-length they will tell you in their next breath.

I Know Its Only Science

But I Like It

Such stupidity. That level of stupidity can only be reversed with punitive public service sackings. The acknowledgement of the existence of aether opens up the possibility for intelligent consciousness somewhat independent of matter. It opens up the possibility of a planetary spirit or a God of sorts. But veering back towards atheism … the existence of aether also opens up the possibility for a greater storage of information than could be possible, if we were relying on the existence of non-aetheric information alone. I am suggesting that aether can be retained within and around the cell and a much greater level of informational memory may be possible than what seems plausible under non-aetheric materialist ideology.

Scientific Cosmology, As Opposed To Cosmological Lies And Irrationality,  Also Helps Make Up Some Of The Gap In The Theory Of Evolution, That Professor Behe Has Helped Uncover. 

So aether honesty opens up more possibilities on both sides of this argument. The mainstream ALSO needs to rid themselves of the young-universe creation myth of the big bang. If they can get rid of these known lies maybe they can hold on to their Darwinian outlook.

But they should choose,  because the mainstream is just making ass-clowns of themselves. If I agreed with the mainstream cosmology of course I would have to agree with Behe in this matter. There is no getting away from what he is saying here. Why even upset yourself trying to contradict Behe on this matter? Why bother? Why confront yourself with that level of cognitive dissonance? I just go with the flow people. I am no Christian but I have a Christian attitude towards the universe. The Christian attitude is “Its Gods universe and I’ll be happy with whatever it is I find out there.” Thats the scientific attitude.”

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Where am I going with this?  Every so often I run into someone who is doing a very good job of defending evolution.  And its never anyone that is being placed in front of us in the media.  Chris Hitchens was an intelligent fellow, but he was weak on science.  Harris is a moron.  Dawkins has turned rigid and blinkered in his dotage.  He’s no longer any kind of committed scientist.  PZ Myers is very low-grade.  You find the better defenders quite by accident.  Maybe you’d be able to run into them if you could catch people getting banned by mindless ideologue PZ Myers.

So as advertised to the public the theory is weak. And people who think about these things deeply will realise the superiority of the leading lights of the intelligent design crowd if they will give them a fair hearing.

Turnabout Is Fair Play.  The Immortal Keith Richards Had Sympathy For The Devil.

Its Okay To Have Sympathy For The Intelligent Design Theorists.  Who Are Whipping Our Sad Asses Right Now. 

In our weight division mutations are a move towards DEVOLUTION and not whiggish evolution.  It is said we pass on 100 more or so mutations every generation.  Mutational devolution is thus the default philosophical position, or should be, in evolutionary theory, just as entropy has become a default notion in physics.  Now entropy is WRONG in physics but we needed to find out WHY it is wrong.  I’ve gone into that on this blog and elsewhere.  But if devolution is not correct in human development, then we need to find out why.

Mutations in our weight division are broken genes.  They are like viruses in the old-fashioned microsoft software.  We can put off the implications of this a while longer by way of marrying outside our race (somehow I swing back to miscegenation despite myself) but that hasn’t solved the problem of how we might hope to avoid devolving into useless piles of sterile festering garbage, as would be natural, if the generational gift of broken genes is not somehow overmatched.

If something is replacing the broken genes with healthy ones, what could that something be? If something is increasing the information, as natural selection reduces that information ….. where might the pristine information be coming from?

I try to drive science on, not by standing on the shoulders of giants, but rather by pushing hard down on the heads of pygmies.  So lets look at the following exchange to see where I may be coming from here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So you see what I’m saying here?  The evolution crowd have been giving us a lot of triumphalist happy-talk about the theory being in good shape.  Its not in good shape at all.  At least its not in good shape if judged by listening to these dummies the media gets to defend it.

What we are looking for is the little critters absorbing the information of even smaller critters, and if so in “object oriented” form. Here I am making an analogy to object oriented programming in computer science.  We can do nothing with broken genes.  We must find ourselves an environment wherein mutation is so numerous in such fast-breeding small critters,  that real and useful information can actually be built up, and in object oriented form. And if this object oriented information can be absorbed into larger species …. then what facilitates this permeability, should it happen at all?

Where Did The Whale Get The Information From In Just 9 Million Years?

So for example we have the idea that the whale evolved from a small four-legged animal over the space of 9 million or so years.   There is counter-evidence to this.  And some may say the evidence is not that solid. Still it seems to be pretty good to me, and so I’ll take it at face value tentatively.  The counter-evidence isn’t that powerfully strong.  Its to do with finding an intact whale that dates to an earlier date then the evolving in-between species.

Now the first thing we might say about the whale evolution story …  is that this progression is a form of evolution I call “New Niche Evolution”  … When an animal in one niche goes into a completely different niche (in this case probably to do with evading a predator) evolutionary pressure, pushing the animal in one direction is pervasive.  Plus an animal that retreats by running into the rivers ….. It achieves the partial but not total isolation necessary to push its gene pool one way.  To push the adaptations of the species in one direction only.  You MUST have the condition of partial but not total isolation to achieve this effect.  This effect is equivalent to a longstanding intelligent breeding program.

(((((This is what some theorists think allowed us to evolve.  Firstly we had the new niche evolution of coming down from the trees, where the trees, the river and the ocean met.  This is my version of the aquatic ape theory.   Then we had the new-niche evolution of repeated glacial periods.  Many Christian theorists in this space say that there is no such thing as macro-evolution.   I don’t go that far.  All I say is that in big animals macro-evolution is fucking hard.  Its not fucking easy.  For the big animals there is only new-niche evolution and rolling holocaust evolution and they both involve partial but not total separation.   I am constantly stunned by the glib assurance that Darwinists have in the reality and indeed the ease of evolution in larger mammals.  But the reality is that evolution is anything but natural for the larger organisms.)))))

But heretofore, in the story of the whale being evolved over 9 million years …. We don’t have the knowledge on tap,  as to whether the whale gained or lost genetic information. We feel surely that it must have gained information.  But where from?  In that weight division broken genes cannot be helpful.  Broken genes are also lost information. We carry more genes than we really need;  so was the proto-whale tapping into its extra gene pool only?

Directed Neotony A Huge Part Of Whale Evolution/ Gigantic Foetus Of A Four-Legged Animal.

Surely neotony was a huge part of this whale evolution story.  Losing the adults hair, increasing the time growing, exaggerated brain development, all this kind of thing.  That whale in someways is a gigantic unborn baby terrestrial.   So directed neotony had to be a big part of this story.

But what about new information?  Was it all old information used in different ways? Believe me this mutation business is complete bullshit and untenable. We can say conclusively that whale evolution had nothing to do with mutation.  Or at least only a little bit and only at first maybe ………

Since we don’t look to mutation and broken genes to help evolution in bigger animals, we may have to look at pulling “object oriented information” out of the plankton.  Plankton gives the information to the gut biome, and perhaps there are some stressful circumstances which may allow some chunks of information to be incorporated into the larger organism.

There has to be something that adds to the information that natural selection, and ambient mutational damage,  is taking away.  Now come on people lets be serious about this.  There has to be that replacement information.   Just as there must be pristine energy in the wider universe.  Or there would be no energy at all and we would by now have all devolved to sludge.

Later I will suggest where the ultimate source of genetic information may be coming from, if its not coming from intelligent design; An idea that ought not be ruled out by any means.  Here I am talking about a better arena than the surface of the earth for ultimate development of new genetic information.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Why am I doing this?  I really have no stake in this rumble.  I have no fellow feeling for my atheist colleagues? My view of physics opens up the possibility of intelligent design even without a supreme being? So why would I try and bridge the gap that has now opened up in favour of the intelligence design advocates?

I know its only science …… But I like it. 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Sympathy For Intelligent Design ………. New Information Could Be Coming From The Aether And From Intelligent Consciousness Within.

How did we come up with matter in the first place?

The electrons, neutrons and protons didn’t just appear out of nowhere.  In my theory first we had flux, then we had aether, then we had matter.  Matter is an offshoot of aether.  We know that the aether/electric/matter Nexus has produced consciousness.  But what is there to say that conscious intelligence or pockets thereof did not precede the development of matter?  And if we are conscious beings, and our consciousness is primarily to do with matter, but also to do with aether and electricity …. Then what is to say that we couldn’t have consciousness that was more aether-biased?

Now what I don’t think we can have is a universe-wide supreme consciousness. Since clear thinking would take such a huge being long periods of time. There needs to be some level of compaction to have real-time thought.  The great theorist Nassim Taleb says that the paradox of the trinity is easily understood by Christians, though to all others its a straight contradiction.  Taleb says that God being also Jesus allows God to have “skin in the game.”  Skin in the game is a concept that the philosopher has written thousands of words about.

Thats fantastic theology.  But any real God would have to reduce in size and scope from a solar system sized being, down to having a more constrained consciousness, just in order to function in something approaching real-time.   And I mean this even when you take superluminal speeds into account.   Because these speeds aren’t infinite.  I think that entanglement has only been measured up to about 17 kilometres last I checked and these people cannot be trusted anyway.

Anyway we could easily have pockets of aetheric-matter based consciousness since its aether that has had longer to evolve.  This is more a justification of animism than anything else.  I’m not opening the door to any fantasy that any primitive fellow might ever have had,  anytime.  But when you see very good evidence the likes of which Michael Behe brought to light in 1996, that does justify opening the door to intelligent design.  Because I’m not deluding myself that I’ve grasped back the lead Behe has gained on us, just in this one article.

Thats a lead that will probably take a century to pull back.  Most of modern cosmology has to be ditched in order to do so.